The Pussy Pass Wins Again

For the past several months American Television has been focused on the murder of a little child named Caylee Anthony who was callously murdered by her mother, Casey Anthony. Ms. Casey used her computer to search for murder means such as chloroform. She finally used duct tape on the kid's mouth and nose to suffocate her child, hid it in the trunk of her car for days until she dumped the body in the woods. Ms. Mom then resumed her desired life of drinking, partying, and fucking.
Daily Beast

More than a month later grandmother Anthony finally notified police that the child was missing more than a month and the mother wouldn't give a straight story. Finally, the decomposed body was found and because of massive TV coverage the local prosecutors brought it to trial.

The American Injustice System wouldn't have brought it to trial without massive pressure from TV news networks. Every day they bend over backward to excuse cunts who murder. Mommy murder is a leading cause of death of children in the US, but very few of them are ever charged. We have euphemism like “SIDS” to excuse mothers who kill. Feminists call it, “A woman's right to choose.” Prospectors won't touch it and juries won't convict. Its not just cunts who murder children who escape prosecution or penalty This week on one of those crime documentary stations, ID, they chronicled the case of a “black widow” cunt who made a living out of marrying and murdering cops and firemen. Even when she poisoned a cop they still wouldn't investigate. “Too expensive.” they said as they buried one of their “brothers.” Only when angry families put together a trail of dead men will the blue gun thugs even investigate. If its not blue gun thugs getting killed, often they still refuse. A cunt who kills men is allowed to do murder without remorse or penalty.

Casey Anthony would have gotten away with child murder if her mother hadn't spent so much time crying on TV cameras. Casey lied. She said that a mythical housekeeper was keeping her child. Photos of a missing little girl were on national news. Finally the body was found and the media was all over the case like stink on shit. Prosecutors saw an opportunity to parade on TV for weeks, so they brought it to court instead of declining to prosecute as they usually do when a cunt kills.

The jury, of course, won't convict a cunt unless there is overwhelming evidence. She has her pussy pass. Evidence that routinely sends men to the executioner is insufficient to convict a cunt of even a lesser crime. Her young defense attorney threw in a lot of the usual irrelevant anti-men hate. Her father molested her as a child. She's a “victim.” Her bother molested her as a child. Boo Hoo, she's a “victim.” The duct tape over the kids mouth had been moved. The kid drowned in a pool and the evil grandfather made it look like a murder. Some other man killed the kid. All her drunken partying and fucking was just how a normal mother deals with the grief of losing her child. Boo Hoo, the salty tears poured down her cheek in court.

We are also left wondering what ever happened to little Caylee's father. Murderous mom told reporters he moved to another state and then died, but refused to give his name. Did murdering mom also murder the father? When a cunt kills a man is not investigated. Ms. Killer Casey is a serial killer specializing in men and children.

The pussy pass won again. Ms. Murdering Casey was not convicted. Females are not convicted in the American Injustice System. Men usually are sent to hell or executed unless they can prove they had nothing to do with the crime. Pussies are excused unless there is overwhelming evidence of multiple murders.

There is no justice in the American Injustice System. Millions of men are rotting in prison for the “crime” of being born male. Pussies do not get sent to prison for equal or worse crime. Its not about justice, its about process.

Reforming The Medical Industrial Complex

UPDATE August 25, 2009

Two more disturbing bits of news on the fascist "Blanc Check" medical industry takeover.

First: The Obama regime already controls medical care for aging veterans under the long established veteran's benefits programs. Obama rolled out its "euthanasia" plan for elderly veterans without waiting for Congress to enact a similar "death for the elderly" plan for all Americans. Elderly veterans now are to receive "counseling" on "Hospice," and pain medication in lieu of medical treatment. Meanwhile FactChuck keeps telling us that the Obama (Blanc Check) plan does not include euthanasia for the elderly.

Second: The Obama regime has extorted millions of dollars from pharmaceutical corporations by threatening them with loss of their monopoly protection, or loss of approval of their products by the FDA. They are being forced to pay for promotion of his (Blanc Check) fascist takeover of the medical industry. You may have noticed the ads on network TV praising Democratic Senators for their support of Obama fascism and asking you to phone them with more encouragement. When you see those ads, think "fascist extortion" being used for a fascist propaganda program.


Original Post. August 20, 2009

THE PROBLEM, A GOVERNMENT CREATED MONOPOLY

Everybody in the US knows that medical treatment has become so expensive that an average working man cannot afford it. Employers have responded by paying for insurance to spread the extreme cost of medical treatment over a whole population. Insurance makes people pay whether they need medical care or not. Mostly insurance makes men pay for the medical treatment of women. Men pay about 80% of medical insurance premiums and women receive about 75% of medical treatment.

From an economic perspective company paid medical insurance is part of the “real wages” that an employer pays to hire you. It gets deducted out of your pay before the taxes are calculated, but its a cost per employee that the employer has to pay. It is part of your pay. And no, of course, the Obama regime wants to tax your total wages, not just your paycheck wages. And you thought he said he wouldn't raise taxes on working people. ROFLMAO!!!

Little by little medical treatment has become so expensive that many employers can no longer afford to pay that much for employees. They have to compete with the next company down the road and so company paid insurance has become a huge expense that they are no longer paying.

Why, you might ask, is medical treatment so expensive? What you get for $400 is 45 minutes waiting in a room full of sick people, 10 minutes of a junior level nurse taking your weight and pulse, and maybe 5 minutes of a doctor's time during which he ignores most of your concerns and tells you to take the latest pills being pushed by some pharmaceutical corporation. The pills cost another $100. If you have insurance you only pay $15 or some token amount while the doctor has to hire 3 office staff to fill out the paperwork from insurance companies and government.

Why does that need to cost $500? Answer: It doesn't have to cost so much. It costs that much because it is a government created and enforced monopoly scheme to bleed your wallet. It is fundamentally a government created “pay or die” extortion scheme. How does the scheme work you might ask? Everyone in the media is talking about “reform” of the health care industry. Are they suggesting anything that will lower these extortion level prices? No, sorry. When you or I think about “reform” of a monopoly extortion racket we think about lowering costs and increasing our freedom of choice. That isn't what the Obama regime, the Democrats, nor the socialist propaganda outlets mean by “reform.” Whenever a corrupt politician is talking about “reform” what they are imagining is a creative new scheme to increase government control over your life and bleed the remaining life out of your wallet.

Instead of actually reforming the government's medical industrial monopoly, the Obama regime is planning to write them a massive blank check from your wallet, to pay all of their extreme prices and whatever they want to charge. They will save costs, as Obama said, by giving the elderly “pain pills” instead of medical treatment.

NEEDED REFORMS -- FREEDOM

Here is a list of reforms that the government could do to greatly lower the extreme cost of medical care. If government would get their corrupt evil hands out of health care the prices would drop back to where you or I could just go into a clinic and buy some.

1. End the government's quota system that limits medical schools and the number of doctors. Our Congresscunt's web page whines about how “concerned” she is over the shortage of doctors, but she says nothing at all about ending the government's quota system. The function of the quota has nothing to do with quality of doctor education. It is solely intended to reduce price competition, create a shortage of doctors, and allow doctors to get rich by selling their time to the highest bidder. When Bob was in University the highly respected medical school accidentally graduated more doctors than allowed by its quota. The AMA/government threatened them with loss of license to educate doctors because the QUOTA had been exceeded. No allegations were made that the huge state university wasn't able to train twice as many quality doctors. They could educate many doctors, if they were allowed to. Its a quota. They exceeded the quota. Too many doctors would create completion and break the government monopoly.

2. Stop the ridiculously expensive over-schooling of doctors. The quota system goes hand in hand with the greatly over expensive training of doctors. It adds nothing to a doctor's medical education to require 16 plus years of school before being allowed to apply for medical school. The Bachelor's degree with “A” average that medical schools require for admission is used to cut the number of doctors and keep an artificial limit on supply, to keep prices up. For most General Practitioner and Family Doctor work it doesn't even really take 4 or 5 years in medical school followed by another 4 years as a “resident” doctor in training at a hospital.

Most medical treatment could be just as effective if done by a doctor who had 4 years of schooling, including part time apprentice work with senior doctors. In the small percentage of difficult cases or complicated surgeries a more expensive and more highly educated doctor could be hired. It is ridiculous and grossly over expensive to require all doctors to be massively over educated for the work they are doing.

The reason why you cannot choose a less expensive general practice doctor is because the government monopoly does not allow less expensive doctors to provide services at reduced cost. No freedom to choose. Lots of government control. A huge and extremely expensive government mandated monopoly is what we have. Will it be reformed? LOL. Not by the Obama regime.

3. Break the government monopoly's control of our basic right to purchase medication when we decide that we need it. Take for example, a typical man “Charlie” who needs another year of Alopurinol for gout. Charlie has been taking Alopurinol for years along with millions of other gout sufferers. One pill a day keeps gout away.

Twenty years ago Charlie consulted a doctor and was prescribed Alopurinol to stop the recurring gout attacks. Consulting with a doctor for a new malady is a good option that Charlie was glad to have. But that was 20 years ago, and the gout continues for the rest of your life if Charlie is like other men.

All the information about Alopurinol is available on the Internet, including the patient information and the “doctor” information. Charlie has read all that, has 20 years of personal experience dealing with gout, and relies on Alopurinol for prevention. Sometime this month Charlie's year supply of pills is running out. In order to purchase another year supply Charlie must have (by government fiat) the permission of a government monopoly overpriced doctor. The government will not allow Charlie to just buy some pills. That would not feed the monopoly that contributes so much to the reelection funds of Congressional swine.

In order to purchase another year of Alopurinol for his gout, Charlie has to pay $100 or more, wait in some stupid room full of sick people for an hour, and endure the indignity of having his body poked, prodded and touched in unfriendly ways. If he's lucky he will only have to pay $100 for the monopoly's permission to purchase his pills. Depending on the doctor Charlie could end up paying $400 or more.

Once Charlie has permission to purchase his pills, he can go to a government regulated pharmacy and pay another $100 for a package of pills that would be priced at $50 in Canada or $25 in Mexico. The reason that health care is so expensive in the US is because the government mandates that millions of men like Charlie have to pay $200 (or more) to purchase $10 worth of pills.

The people have a fundamental right to choose our own doctor, to choose a highly skilled specialist or an inexpensive general practitioner for a routine problem. We have a right to buy another year of our pills without paying the government monopoly for permission. It is the government that is responsible for extremely high prices in the medical industrial monopoly.

In Charlie's case, 95% of the cost is waste and abuse caused by government. That is typical of the whole medical industrial monopoly. Real “reform” would get the government out of our lives, out of our doctor's offices, and off our backs.

4. Break the trial lieyer's fraudulent lawsuits against doctors. In a typical fraud, Senator Edwards made a large fortune by filing fraudulent lawsuits against OBGYN doctors in small rural areas where uneducated juries could be found. Edwards would convince juries with crying women rather than facts and evidence. His lawsuits raised the price of a typical OBGYN's malpractice insurance greatly. Edwards is single handedly responsible for raising the cost of OBGYN services to the average woman by about 25% across the whole US. Lieyer Edwards made a huge fortune, and spent some of his money getting himself elected to the US Senate.

The Edwards fraudulent lawsuits of OBGYNs are just one example of out of control single party and class action suits that plague doctors every day. Something like 1/3 of all the money doctors and hospitals charge goes to their malpractice insurance. Many doctors also use “defensive” tests, expensive unneeded tests, done solely as a hedge against frivolous and costly lawsuits.

Sometimes called “Tort Reform” a law limiting medical lawsuit damages to reasonable actual damages and barring “punitive” extra damages would greatly reduce medical costs. Yes, it is sad when some patient suffers because a doctor made a mistake. Raising the price of medical care for all the other patients in the US will not restore an arm, vision, or life that was lost by the mistake.

Tort reform would prevent unscrupulous lieyers like Edwards from getting rich on the backs of hard working men and women who need medical care. Will the Senate consider Tort reform? Is Edwards a Senator? Who's ox is getting gored? You figure it out.

5. End the government required monopoly in the pharmaceutical industry. The pharmaceutical industry pays big contributions to Congressmen to protect them from low priced competition. For example, several states that have free medical programs for poor people discovered that they could buy pills in Canada for less than the price in the US. The government passed a law making it illegal to purchase US made pills in Canada for lower prices than they are sold for in the US.

The price we pay for pills in the US is often 100 times what we should be paying without the government monopoly. A package of pills that costs 25 cents to produce will be sold for $2.50 in Africa, $25 in Europe, $50 in Mexico, $100 in Canada, and $250 in the US. If the government monopoly would allow competition, some small business startup would be producing the very same quality pills (or better) in your town and selling them for a handsome profit at $5. The rest of the $250 is the government monopoly.

Some will argue that the big corporate pill pushers are assuring quality. But small business often produces better quality than impersonal corporations. For example, the beer industry. Local small business often makes far better beer than big corporations. Local small business is much more sensitive to customers turning away when the quality slips. Big corporations can and often do sell crap to customers who can't tell the difference. The quality of corporate products is especially bad when they know that they have a government monopoly so you buy their crap made pill or die.

Some will argue that giving massive profits to corporations allows them to fund medical research. Okay, that's nice, but how many billion of our dollars goes to greedy profits and congressional corruption? There are far better ways to fund medical research than by giving a total monopoly to all the huge corporations for all the generic pills that can be produced on any corner.

Cutting off the government monopoly in the pharmaceutical industry would cut pill costs in the US to less than 10% of what we pay now. It would cut pharmaceutical corporation contributions to corrupt politicians by the same percentages. That's why they don't do it.

SUMMARY OF NEEDED REFORMS
1.End the quota system for doctors
2.End the mandated extremely over-education of doctors
3.Allow free citizens to purchase pharmaceuticals at our own decision. It's our body.
4.Break the Lieyer scum with Tort Reform
5.Break the pharmaceutical monopoly by allowing open manufacture and sale of pills.

WHAT CONGRESS AND OBAMA ARE DOING

Obama, Congress, and the Fascist NYC propaganda machine are all taking about “reform” of medical care in the US. They are not suggesting any of the needed reforms. When a fascist politician talks about “reform” what he means is that he has invented a new scheme to further extend control of your life and bleed your purse even more than it is being bled now.

None of the Congress, of either party, are talking about real reform in medical care. Only the Republicans are talking about Tort Reform and they only bring it up because they know the Dem's won't talk about it.

Congress is planning to write a blank check to their obscenely overpriced medical industrial monopoly, and pay for the check by taxing YOUR bank account or wages. They are proposing to require all Americans to pay for the bloated sow of monopoly medicine whether you are healthy or sick, and to extend free benefits to every illegal alien who can run across the border. Obama promised free medical care to every Mexican who can get into the US during his recent trip to Mexico.

WHAT CAN YOU DO

Bob does not advocate insurrection, sedition, murder, violence, assault, or any other criminal or illegal acts. You can only take every opportunity to speak with corrupt politicians and demand real reform. Don't expect the fascist government and corrupt politicians to listen to the people.

Perhaps when the total economic collapse that will inevitably come from their incompetent and corrupt mismanagement the people can reorganize a more just government. Save whiskey for trade goods.

Just shoot him!

If he's too drunk to drive, Just shoot him.
Niles L. Meservey, age 51, was minding his own business having a something to eat and a few drinks at a local restaurant. When he left to go home some “do gooder” patrons decided to have him shot instead of risking his expensive car driving home. That is what the government's feminist anti-alcohol hate program tells them to do. Its the same old anti-men hate that feminazi have been pumping out since the WCTU pushed prohibition in the 1920s. The other bar patrons called in the blue gun thugs.

The blue gun thugs did their job. They first hit Mr Meservey with a tazer, causing him to be unable to control his Corvette. Then they shot and killed him. That's what they do. Killing is their job.

As a reward for assassinating another good man, the blue gun thug who pulled the trigger is being rewarded with additional paid vacation. Blue gun thug officials have refused to tell the public the name of the blue shirt assassin who ended the life of another good family man.

They tell us that they are “protecting” the public. They sure protected the hell out of Mr. Meservey. He will never be risking his life by driving after dinner again.

From the comment section of a Seattle paper here is how murderous assassins kill:

He was a very good man that was put in a lose lose situation by the Everett Police Department.

His car was boxed in between two other cars in the parking lot, the fence in front of him & three police cars behind him. When one officer tasered him through the open window that he had willfully rolled down to explain himself. His body Tensed & Shook from the taser prong in him & the car lurched forward as his foot shook.

The second officer then fired 6 shots two in the back of the head, four in his back through the back of his seat & through the back window of his Corvette.

The blue gun thugs are the antithesis of Free Men. They are agents of oppressive tyranny. They do not protect anyone. They are evil in blue, the most dangerous gang of terrorist thugs in our land. We don't need them. We don't want them. And we all would be much better off without them.

If you want to contact Chief Blue Gun Thug Jim Scharf at the Everett, WA, pig sty, here is the info:

3002 Wetmore Ave.
Everett, WA 98201
T: 425-257-8400
F: 425-257-6500
E: police@ci.everett.wa.us

Seattle Times Article

How deep is NYPD corruption?

VERY, VERY, VERY deep.
The blue gun thugs of New York are once again caught red handed dealing drugs and destroying the lives of hard working men. Its so shocking that even the cunt defense lieyer Rochelle Berliner, a former narcotics Persecutor finds it shocking. Good thing she changed sides after working to destroy the lives of 1,800 men.

Jose and Maximo Colon weren't just arrested on a fictitious drug charge, when video tape evidence proved that the NYPD were all lying, the rest of the corruption in NYC government canceled their business license for the convenience store the hard working brothers ran. Its not just “a bad cop.” Its the whole rotten corruption in City Hall. From Blomberg on down, they are the scum of the earth. Read Yahoo News Story

If you impaled all the rotten slimeballs from NYC on a row of poles starting in Times Square, and planted a pole every 10 feet, would you get all the way to Washington, DC?

Freedom?

The USA was once a land of free men. We still sing our song, "Land of the free and home of the brave." But even as we sing it, our lives are controlled by the state from our birth in a state licensed facility to our burial by a state licensed cemetery. We spend most of the first two decades of our lives being indoctrinated in state youth prisons, moving in unison to the sound of bells, learning to obey and follow orders with the other sheeple. We pay half of everything we earn to federal, state, and local taxes, most of which pay for massive police state gangs of thugs who control and dominate our lives. All government is the antithesis of freedom, and massive government is no freedom at all. Both of our major political parties and virtually all of the smaller ones only argue about how best to control and dominate a people who's ancestors were free men.

We have become the land of the enslaved and the home of the sheeple.

Bob is beginning a series of articles on freedom, what it actually means, and how to reclaim it. Bob is looking for anecdotes and stories about how the people are enslaved. Do you resent having to get a license and allow the state to control your every move and action? Is there any particular license that you find particularly offensive? Would you like to run a business without the state controlling you through their license requirements? Would you enjoy being able to run your own life and that of your family without constant coercion and control by the "Big Brother" state?

Bob is looking for stories and anecdotes to include in upcoming articles. Thank you all in advance.

To own and bear ARMS!

The 2nd Amendment of the US Constitution is supposed to protect the right of the people to own "regular" military "ARMS!" The purpose of the 2nd Amendment is to preserve for the people the ability to attack, destroy, and replace a government that has become tryannical. It has nothing at all to do with hunting or recreational rifles. If it takes tanks and artilliary to take down a tyranical government that is the right of the preople. Washington, Jefferson, Franklin, Adams and their friends all believed in and practiced that kind of popular democracy.

Real power ALWAYS comes at the point of arms. Real freedom only exists when the men who would be free are willing and able to own and bear arms effectively.

For more reading see Second Amendment

Fixing the American Injustice System

The Anonymous Lieyer keeps asking Bob for suggestions on improving the American Injustice System (AIS). It was really too long to be posted as a comment on another topic, and the AIS is such an important topic that Bob has created this article for the topic.

The problems with the AIS are so extensive that most of it should just be torn down. Most so-called “crime” exists only for the purpose of fighting “crime.” The “drug business” now supports the MAJORITY of blue suits, Agents of Satan in black robes of Hell, prisons, parole boards, chain gang labor contractors, etc. The only purpose of the drug business is to justify “fighting crime.” The harm that the drub business of the AIS does is far worse than was caused before drugs became illegal. The use of drugs is still about the same small percentage of the population. Making drugs illegal was originally justified to stop black men from raping white girls, a bold face lie. Fighting drugs is hugely worse than the harm which would result if the laws were just ended and prisoners released. Cocaine is not as addictive as tobacco, but we don’t have massive corruption, robbery, murder, and millions of men sent to prison for tobacco. Like alcohol prohibition the AIS drug business creates massive crime, violence, and corruption. Like alcohol prohibition it needs to be repealed.

The rest of this article consists of questions by an anonymous lieyer, herein “me” and responses by Bob. Some of Bob’s previous comments were included in the lieyer’s questions.

Me say: I never asked if it was better just what would you replace it with. I agree there is so much injustice. I think of the man in Alabama who while serving a long sentence for rape was cleared by DNA but the prosecutor would not file the papers to release him because "he was found guilty by a jury" and it took close to 2 years to get him out. But we need something maybe not for the victimless crimes so to speak but what about the ted bundys, dahmers, etc of our society?

Bob says“Convicted by a jury” is a term that describes the complete corruption of the AIS. Juries are selected to be ignorant stupid people who are unable to think for themselves. Then they are treated like mushrooms, kept in the dark with shit poured on their heads. If there was any intention of JUSTICE, the juries would effectively control the courtroom. The JURY could ask the questions, subpoena witnesses, decide what evidence it needs to consider and what it does not need, and tell lieyers to sit down and shut the fuck up. The AIS abandoned even the charade of “justice” long ago. Their public policy is only to decide which lieyer or expensive team of lieyers gave the best performance. Justice, and guilt or innocence, has absolutely nothing to do with the AIS. The AIS uses stupid ignorant juries to railroad men, not to find justice.

For example, in one case in NYC, there were two different men being tried for the same murder in adjacent court rooms. The Persecutor is legally required to be convinced of the guilt of the accused before bringing charges, and the two cases were mutually exclusive proof that he believed in the guild of neither man. But the lying criminals in black robes of hell accepted both cases. Most of them are worse criminals than the accused, like Filthy Turd Nifong.

If there was JUSTICE, a false accusation would be punished with the same punishment that the accused would have received had he been guilty. In previous times with a legal system focused on justice, that was the law. No persecutor would bring charges unless he was damn sure that the accused person was guilty, and damn sure he could prove it. The epidemic of false rape accusations, false “abuse” accusations, etc., would come to a rapid end. We would not have two different men tried for the same murder in adjacent courtrooms.

The very few examples of guilty parties like Dahmer, or mothers who kill their children could be taken out and hanged summarily by a real jury doing real justice.

me say: True and the correctional guard as a career is the fastest growing career. now we have for profit prison and our tax money pays to keep prisoners in them and they are even worse than the state prisons. what a society, kill education money and spend it for profit prison, even the state prisons are run by those who tend to make money off it. Agree, we have more prisoners than Russia and look at the nations we share the death penalty with..

Bob said previously: There is a very sexist bias against men throughout the AIS from first contact to end of parole and beyond.

me say: Just curious how does this equate to bias against men. there are also more women in prison in the US than ever before in history and women have faced the death penalty too. yes, maybe women get it easier in court as a result of only recently becoming more and more active in crime (or getting caught) however, I would say the system bias is against the non white male more than just against men.

Bob saysThere is a well documented systematic bias against men from the first phone call to the blue gun thugs, all the way trough the system. Even with the recent percentage increase in arrest of females, about 24 of ever 25 men in prison are there for the “crime” of being born male. Females who do the exact same violent acts and often worse, are mostly still home with their families.

The systematic AIS bias against men begins with the first contact with blue gun thugs and lasts through the whole AIS.

The blue gun thugs are much more likely to respond for a female “victim” than a male victim. The female perpetrator’s assault often just gets ignored.

The blue gun thugs often arrest the man when he reprots that he is the victim of female violence.

The blue gun thugs are more likely to arrest a man and let a female go for identical crimes, or when they committed the same crime together.

Poison is the most common weapon for female committed murders, and is generally not reported as crime. Females also are rarely prosecuted for crimes and even murder against children.

If arrested the female is more likely to be released on reduced bail.

If arrested the man is more likely to be prosecuted.

IF arrested the female is much more likely to be offered a reduced sentence for testifying against the man.

If prosecuted the female is likely to be charged with a lesser crime.

There are numerous female only defenses that are commonly used by lieyers to convince a jury not to convict.

If prosecuted the female is more likely to be found “not guilty.”

If found guilty the female will often be found guilty of a lesser crime.

If convicted the female will usually get a much lese severe sentence for the same crime.

If convicted the female is more likely to be sentenced to parole instead of prison for the same crime.

If sentenced to prison the female will get her sentenced reduced by parole much sooner.

If sent to prison the female prisons are much less brutal, some are almost resort like. Sometimes her children can even live with her while in prison.

If in prison the female is far less likely to be charged with other “prison crimes” and have her sentence extended.

Females will usually not be forced to join prison gangs, violently assaulted, raped, and abused while in prisons.

And finally, she will be paroled sooner and will have better resources for the transition back to society.

Typical of the prejudice of the AIS, a recent court sentenced a female murderess to pay for her victim's funeral and not kill anyone else for 5 years. Read story Men guilty of the same kind of gang murder often spend several decades in brutal hellhole prisons.

Black men have a somewhat higher percentage of men in prisons than white men, but that may be because the so-called “crimes” such as the AIS’s drug business, are done more by minority groups. Even so, white men are persecuted far more than black or white women. The well publicized Duke University Lacrosse Team case is an example of systematic sexist bias in the AIS. Overall, the AIS persecutes men 25 times as often as females. Bob has previously called for “Affirmative Action” in punishment and a moratorium on conviction of men for any crime until the historic sexist imbalance has been corrected. See Demand of Men

Bob said previously: The AIS is arguably the worst legal system in the entire history of mankind.

me say: what are you comparing it to, show me something better, more workable.

Bob says: Compare to any other nation in the history of mankind and the US has more men in prison and a higher percentage of men in prison than any other nation, ever. In some American cities like Cleveland for example, the majority of men are now “convicted felons.” Those statistics are prima fascia evidence that our AIS is the worst ever. It has destroyed the lives of more men than any other illegal system anywhere, any time.

Society would work better, and far fewer lives would be destroyed, if all the blue gun thugs, lieyers, Agents of Satan in black robes of hell, and prison guards were impaled in a line down main street, and their bodies left to rot. There would still be a small number of crimes, but most people would soon protect themselves. The total death and destruction of men, families, and lives would be far, far less than we have today. The first thing the AIS does is to prevent good men from protecting ourselves. They don’t protect us either, as the AIS has proven to SCOUS, and we are left without protection from violence. The second thing the AIS does is to capture and destroy as many men as they can find to destroy. Without the AIS we free citizens could protect ourselves and rejoice in a return to freedom without Big Brother Police State supervising every part of our lives.

Bob has made numerous other suggestions for less severe improvements, such as introducing “fair” trials by jury, a return to “justice” rather than judging between preening lieyers, Affirmative Action, and elimination of faux crimes created solely for the purpose of “fighting crime.”

Bob said previouslyLike the end of Prohibition, it's time to recognize that the whole radical feminist social experiment has been the worst disaster for families and children ever conceived, and to repeal the whole misandrist anti-family hate laws that underlay the social disaster.

me say: again how do you go there from there etc? Women are people are free and some choose to work, some have to work, and some get educated and some don't just like men, we are all different and you keep lumping us all together, I was not out burning my bra and I did not support ERA but I need to work and support my family since my ex husband chooses to drink alcohol to excess instead of work. should I go on welfare or work? you have points that are good but then you spit out the party line, your party line and it doesn’t fit, make it fit, make it pertinent, make it realistic.

Bob saysI don’t recall any pre-feminism laws that prevented females from working. Females have always worked. What is needed is to eliminate the sexist laws that make females into a special protected class and turn men into criminals for being born male.