The World According To Bob
Bob Allen is a philosopher and cyber libertarian. He advocates for the basic human rights of men. Bob has learned to cut through the political nonsense, the propaganda hate, the surface discourse, and talk about the underlying metamessage that the front is hiding. Bob tells it like it is and lets the chips fall where they may. If you like what you read be sure to bookmark this blog and share it with your friends.
About Me
- Name: Bob
- Location: United States
You can't make wrong into right by doing wrong more effectively. It's time for real MEN to stand up and take back our families, our society, and our self respect. It is not a crime to be born a man. It is not a crime to act manly.
Thursday, November 22, 2012
Thursday, May 20, 2010
Fathers, its up to you
Your Little Princess is just like her mother. She wants a hard man between her legs, and nothing she tells you, and nothing you tell her, is going to stop her from getting it. If you keep your head buried in feminist dogma, this is your daughter's story. The details change, but the story is always the same:
Posted on Answerology.com at about 5:45 PM on 5-20-2010.
made a huge mistake, how can I take it back?
I go to school away from home so its a lot easier for me to have a crazy life, last year i got pregnant, when i went back home to see my family during the summer i was barely noticing but they thought i was putting on weight; i gave birth before the holidays but i was so afraid of my familys reaction that left my baby at the hospital (i dont know who the father is) i went home and everything is normal; this mothers day it finally hit me what i had done; how can i tell my family what i did; get support from them, and how can i get my baby back, how do i find out who has my baby and if shes in good hands
Asked by Female, 22-25
The details change, but the story is always the same. We have these baby abandon laws in US states now because so many young mothers were dumping their unwanted babies in trash dumpsters. Most of them get an abortion, or 2 or 3, by the time they are out of college. According to government statistics, the average American “Little Princess,” starts getting laid at age 14.8. By “average” it means that half of the girls start getting laid younger than that. By the time she is 30 she has soaked up the sperm from a hundred or more men, some of whom she got the name of. She looks around in panic and remembers she was supposed to be married. A few of the sluts manage to corral a man, but most don't. About half the next generation is born to unmarried mothers. She has a great job as a secretary where her MA in Women's Studies is no advantage at all. Her life is a disaster.
Is this the future you fathers really want for your Little Princess? Is it really what you want?
In functional traditional families young women wait for marriage because they know that marriage is something that will actually happen soon. The traditional young woman learns basic education, and learns home economics, cooking, sewing, cleaning, banking, borrowing, budgeting, saving, hospitality, and child care. Her parents help her find a good husband, probably 10 years older, who can support her and her family, a good man who can take care of the cravings between her legs and the empty womb she lusts to fill. A good father knows that Little Princess is a grown woman ready for marriage shortly after puberty. A good father supports and helps his Little Princess to become a good wife and mother for his granddaughter and grandson.
A good father should expect to “give away” his “little princess” when she marries, shortly after she matures past puberty. Giving away the bride to a good man is the mark of success for fathers of girls. That should be your ultimate goal as her fathers. You should be guiding her away from the false feminist failure life that schools and society now tells everyone she is supposed to have. As her father, you should work hard to guide her into marriage and family when she is ready, in her early teenage years when her body demands sex and babies, when she is young and strong and can bear the stress of pregnancy without failure, when she won't be a single mother leaving your granddaughter at the hospital or fire station.
Don't be a failure father like so many other fathers of failure feminist 30 something bitches. If you follow tradition, and Bob's advice, by the time your married grown up Princess is 30 something she will be preparing her daughter for marriage, and enrolling in a college to continue her education. She will have it all, because she did it in the order that Mother Nature provides for her.
Tell the anti-family hate monger bitches to pound sand. They aren't going to take away your family and your grandchildren. Your grandson won't be left at some hospital or fire station. Talk to your Little Princess about life and how to be a success. Talk to her mother. Help Little Princess be a success, to be a wife and mother, to live a full, rich, wonderful life.
Dads, its up to you. Are you going to help your daughters to have a wonderful life, or hurt them by barring marriage to a good man and pushing them into abortions, relationships, and a failed (man's) career? Dads, its up to you to save your daughters.
Labels: age of marriage, family, Fatherhood, fathers
Friday, April 02, 2010
Marriage, Morality, and Men

Tiger and Elin Woods
Jesse James wasn't injured but has publicly apologized. Jesse James is a “bad boy” biker who runs a motorcycle shop called West Coast Choppers. He was featured on a reality show called Monster Garage. Jesse is a distant relative of the infamous outlaw of the same name. His wife, Sandra Bullock, is a Hollywood star. Wimps apologize. Men claim their actions.

Jesse and Sandra James
Were these men as bad as the popular (feminist) misandrist media would have us believe? Lets look at the marriage from historical, moral, and practical views. Most people today have a very confused understanding of marriage. For 160 years feminists have been waging war against marriage, pushing the lie that “marriage oppresses women.” The feminist goal is to have every female a lesbian. Gays have worked hard, supported by liberal media and politicians, to promote the myth that marriage is some list of government benefits given for “love.” Both groups falsely have claimed that marriage is a Christian invention. Some Christians say that you can only be married because of Jesus. But neither feminists nor gays nor Christians gives us truth.
Marriage is the biological union of a man and woman that makes a child and forms a family. In a very real physical sense the child is the marriage. The basic form of marriage has been part of every human culture, tribe, village, city, religion and nation since long before history. Marriage joins two families into one because the child has one foot in each family. Marriage produces the future of tribes and nations. Marriage is not about “love” but whom you breed with.
The oldest surviving written law code, the Code of Hammurabi, included extensive law on marriage. Marriage customs clearly were older than the written law. Every religion and every government has a strong interest in producing and raising the next generation. A few radical religions that have not supported marriage, the Shakers for example, have disappeared in one generation. Another ancient law code on marriage is Celtic law which was in force across much of Europe before the Roman conquest. In Celtic marriage law several “kinds” of marriage are listed depending on the wealth of the parents and who is supposed to pay to support the children. In the first kind of marriage both parents come from rich families and share the cost of raising the child. In the second kind of marriage the husband comes from a rich family and he will pay to raise the child. In the last kind of marriage the mother is a whore. She is solely responsible for raising the child.
Marriage is an important event for the whole tribe, village, and community. The families of both husband and wife gather to celebrate and witness the union of the two families. The religious leader of their faith gives his blessing. Vows are made and congratulations are given. The couple is then given a few days away from normal responsibility to have time for the sexual union that will consummate the marriage. In many places and times, in much of Europe for most of the past two millennia for example, the couple was only “betrothed” and doing sex together until a child was born. When the child is born the marriage is consummated and they are recognized as married by the community. If no child comes forth, the betrothal is annulled and the couple parts. Protestants and some Catholics are ascetic to the point that they frown on sex until a legal “marriage” but even there when there is no consummation the marriage can be annulled.
In many cultures, parents or families arrange marriages of sons and daughters. The western custom of inexperienced youth choosing mates for “love” (lust) is less than two centuries old. The long term success rates of arranged marriages is better than lust choices. A female's situation is quite different from the man's situation, so her needs in choosing a husband are quite different than his needs for a wife. A young female needs to have a man who is old enough and economically well established enough to support her and her children. A man needs a female who is young, healthy, and strong enough to bear and raise good children. For thousands of generations young females often chose men who were 10 or more years older than they are. There seems to be an evolutionary behavior of females to be sexually attracted to older men because of the long history of making this choice.
The vows in a traditional marriage are somewhat different for men and females.
The female promises:
1.To engage in sex with the husband, and husband ONLY, so that she may
2.Become pregnant by her husband, and then
3.To bear and raise his children. She also promises
4.To manage his house,
5.To assist in the work of the family as much as she is able while nurturing the children of the marriage
6.To remain his wife as long as the she and the children shall live.
7.To love, honor, and obey her husband.
The man promises:
1.To engage in sex with the female so that she may become pregnant and bear his children,
2.To support and protect her and his children to the best of his ability.
3.To retain her as his wife as long as he and the children live.
4.To provide guidance, leadership, discipline, and teaching for his wife and children as leader of the family.
In cultures where there are more than 1 wife, the first wife is also expected to manage the household and direct the work of the 2nd or subsequent wives. Note that only the female vows to limit her sexual experience because only she can bring other children to disrupt her marriage.
In Christian, Jewish, and Islamic holy writing the penalty for an adulterous wife is stoning to death. A wife's adultery is literally a matter of life an death. Similar teaching and penalties are common in many cultures and religions. A husband who administers the religious penalty on his wife for adultery, destroying his family, and stealing his children is a moral and virtuous man. So are any from the village who assist him. Feminazi thugs and gangsters who protect the unrighteous whore from her just punishment are immoral and should be shunned from the company of decent people.
Throughout all of history females have divided themselves into two classes, wives and whores. A wife limits her sexual activity to her husband so that her children are his children. In exchange for her restraint and obedience she receives his love, support, and protection. A whore is any female who turns away from the wife career, engaging in sex with a range of temporary “partners.” Often whores were “courtesans” who learned poetry, music, writing, and other education. Whores engage in sex for money, for favors, for manipulation and control, or just for lust. Whoring is sometimes called the oldest profession. It is where all the non-wives, feminists, lesbians, and other bad females spend their lives.
In moral (pre-feminist) legal codes a man is obligated ONLY to support the children he agreed to support, the children of his monogamous wife. He has no moral or ethical obligation to support bastards of a whore. She and she alone is responsible for their support. He may choose to claim his bastards, and may contribute to their support as he sees fit, but he has no moral or legal obligation to do so.
At the feminist Seneca Falls Conference in 1848, lesbian feminists declared war on marriage. They believed that females are owed support whether married or not, whether they work or not. Feminist females believe that they “deserve” to be supported by men. At the Seneca Falls Conference feminists adopted a long term goal of female leaving their husbands, taking his children, and still forcing him to support them. Over the next 100 years feminists lobbied legal changes such as alimony, no-fault divorce, female custody of his children, and finally the indentured servitude (slavery) of fathers under the euphemism “child support.” A big piece of their misandrist agenda was female suffrage which gives them the political power to force these changes, destroy marriage and family, and enslave men.
FemiNazi believe that they are “entitled” claim all the money that all men earn, for no reason other than being endowed with a cunt. They have twisted marriage until the current law has no benefits for men and no obligations for females.
The vows under feminist legal and immoral codes are as follows:
She vows:
1.Not much of anything. She isn't obligated to sex, or bearing his children. She may abort (murder) his child or cry "rape" for sex. She doesn't promise to take his name, nor keep his house. She can fuck any other man she wants. She can leave any time she feels like it, and take his children and property.
He vows:
1.He will give her sex when and if she wants it.
2.He will do the housework in addition to working a killer job to provide for her shoe shopping.
3.He gives her at least half of his property including real and personal property, investments, and all his earnings. Often she gets it all.
4.He gives her ownership of his children, if any.
5.He owes her his future earnings if she bears any children, even those of other men.
6.He promises to support her and her children until hell freezes over or the lazy bums finish college and graduate school and who knows how long after that.
7.He will obey her and not complain if she beats him with a frying pan, etc.
Note that under feminist marriage law he is obligated to much of that list even if he has never agreed to marry the whore. If she gets pregnant (who knows by whom) and claims him as the father of her bastard, she may claim the majority of his “estimated” future earnings for the next 20 years under penalty of prison. Obviously men gain nothing and lose everything in a marriage under feminism. Take Bob's advice and Don't do it. Don't ever do it. You cannot win.
Now getting back to Tiger Woods and Jessey James.
In a traditional marriage, a husband vows to engage in sex with his wife. He does not vow to monogamy under her control and domination. A real man does not kowtow to feminazi control. He does not grovel and beg forgiveness for shagging some other hot twat. In civilized cultures females don't expect to own their husbands lives. In civilized cultures females understand that their part of the bargain of marriage is a claim on his support and protection, but not a claim to own and control him. It used to be said that a good woman wouldn't want a man who couldn't even get a mistress. When French President Mitterrand died a few years ago his wife and children sat in the first row at his funeral. The second row was reserved for his mistress and her children. None of the French whined about “how could she tolerate” a man who was rich and powerful and had a mistress.
Tiger Woods made a billion dollars. His wife lived in a fabulous home with a staff of servants helping her take care of his children. To make his billion he had to spend months moving from town to town staying in hotels and eating in restaurants. There is nothing in traditional marriage vows that precludes taking advantage of the long line of whores who always flock around rich athletic men. Instead of apologizing to the feminist wife, and to the feminist media whores, he should have claimed his power. He should have said something like “I'm a rich athlete. Women line up to entertain me. We had a good time. Take your jealousy and pound sand.”
Jesse James ended up with a rich bitch Hollywood star wife. She was always gone somewhere doing the latest film. And even when she was home, a man gets bored banging the same old tired cunt. At age 40 plus, she isn't going to bear children anyway, so its a marriage that never will be consummated. Ms. Sandra Bullock picked him because he was a 'bad boy” biker. Nice guys don't get laid, every man knows that. So the “bad boy” biker likes to bang kinky tattooed biker babes just for fun. It really doesn't matter if he bangs a few biker babes. As long as he bangs his wife now and then, and lets her play house with his daughter she has no bitch. She gets to show off her “bad boy” biker at fancy Hollywood parties. No problem.
While we are on the topic of marriage, the topic of bride kidnapping or marriage by abduction sometimes comes up. Of course the feminazi anti-marriage men hating press has a feminazi hissy fit, but marriage by abduction is a very old custom among many cultures. A 1950s Major Hollywood musical film, Seven Brides for Seven Brothers, celebrated kidnapped brides, all of whom found love and happiness with their new husbands. The great Genghis Kahn captured a bride from every city he conquered. It is occasionally still done in the US, but the femiNazi and their blue gun thug Gestapo go totally bananas. Feminazi demand female control, and bride capture puts the man in control.
In a traditional moral society a good father keeps his daughter in his home and supports her until she is of an age to breed, perhaps 13 or 15. The good father then looks for a good husband for his daughter, and helps her to find an appropriate man who can support and protect her. He seeks men who are old enough to support her. The good father gives her hand to the husband in the marriage ceremony, and his fatherly responsibility for her is ended. Unfortunately for many young females in this society, too many men have been raised under feminist indoctrination. Too many men now think that their daughter is supposed to follow the false feminist life plan away from marriage and into whoring. Too many men want daughters to eschew marriage to pursue a man's “education” and a man's career while she entertains a long parade of men through her cunt. In addition, far too many young females today are born bastards, or are taken from their fathers to be raised as whores by feminist whore mothers.
Recently some feminist asked Bob about the moral situationist of a husband who was banging some whore at work. When the whore got pregnant and created a bastard his wife threw a hissy fit and abrogated her marriage, women no longer vow to stay married. The wife lost face among feminists because she could not control her husband, so she abandoned her marriage. Both females, the whore and the wife, hired lieyers who used the kangaroo “family” court system to take all his property and money plus his future earnings.
The morality of that hypothetical is, first, the whore is solely responsible for her bastard. She and she alone has available birth control pills, abortions, abandonment, or adoption. She has the moral responsibility of a whore for her bastards, plus a new responsibility for all the choices she makes to create the bastard. Second, the wife has no moral reason to seriously harm her children and her own life by tearing up her marriage. She turns her daughters into whores instead of good young women when they lose the protection and guidance of their father. Her sons become fatherless losers, and she goes from a high status wife to a low life whore. Instead of losing face among femiNazi, she should be proud that she is the wife of a man whom so many women want, a very enviable position.
We could also mention the fiction of “gay marriage.” The whole concept of so-called “gay marriage” being pushed hard by loony lefties, feminists, and faggots is a lie and a contradiction. Neither Adam and Steve, nor Sue and Eve can make a baby together. There can never be a marriage of two men or two females. Marriage is a biological union, not a list of government benefits given for love. The government supports real biological marriage because society has a serious interest in supporting families that bear the huge cost of raising the next generation. Two rump riders, or two lolly lickers claiming the modest benefits designed for children has all the moral virtue of adults stealing Halloween candy from kids. Shame on all the perverts and loony lefties who wage war on marriage by promoting fiction and lies called “gay marriage.”
Many men are now refusing to marry because of the legal nightmare that leftist legislatures have created at the request of misandrist lesbian feminists. Until and unless marriage is restored to some common sense with a semblance of equality between men and females there are no benefits for men. Only a damn fool would contemplate marriage under such extreme misandrist law. The biggest mistake that Woods and James made was thinking that the men's nightmare of feminist marriage laws didn't apply to them. They thought they were different. Fools.
Monday, February 01, 2010
Haitian Men starve while “Women Only” get food
This week we have learned that the United Nations, World Food Program is distributing food to Women Only. Haitian men are told to starve. American troops are forcefully stopping men from access to food. The Women Only food program is said to have been started by Canadian relief workers. Canada prides itself on “equality” for all people, but when they go to Haiti to distribute food Canada has been totally sexist. It violates their Canadian Charter of Rights which requires the Canadian Government to protect equal rights for all. The United Nations, unlike Canada, has a long standing reputation for flagrant anti-men sexism. It should not be a surprise that the United Nations is telling men to go starve while Women Only get food. That is the usual UN hate program. But this example in Haiti is more public and more blatant than usual even for the UN. They seldom have the US military enforcing the prohibition on men getting fed. Many men throughout the world of men's rights are shocked and horrified that civilized nations would be so blatantly and publicly sexist.
Bill Clinton and George Bush, along with Michelle Obama, have been on TV asking for donations for the extreme sexist anti-men hate and starvation program going on in Haiti. Men in several nations would otherwise donate generously to save starving people, but we are now refusing to donate as long as “saving people” does not include saving men. Unlike the bigots running the UN and other rescue operations, we understand that men are “people” too.
The UN lies to reporters and misandrist reporters recite feminist excuses that they are not preventing men from getting food. They say that “men in need of assistance are not excluded.” But their actions shout so loud that their lies are not heard. What they are actually doing is to stop men from getting food by force of arms. They also push all the old tired sexist propaganda about women feeding families. A basic understanding of fathers supporting our families throughout history has been brushed aside by feminist anti-men hate at the UN. Shame on them and their whole men must starve program. Bob will not be donating to any sexist relief for Haiti that supports women and starves men.
A crime against one man is a crime against all men.
Read CBC story
Labels: fathers, Feminism, government tyranny
Tuesday, June 16, 2009
Annual Father's Day Hate
It is typical of the anti-father, anti-men hate that the media spews every year. These hate bigots should be horse whipped before being hung.
Your local media, print or broadcast, will be republishing all the same hate for Father's Day. They get it from AP and other misandrist sources. The editors are bred for hate and think that anti-men hate is "celebrating" fathers. Phone your local newspaper or TV outlet and complain.

Hate is a media tradition on Father's Day
The truth about divorce is that females file about 90% of divorces and the top 3 reasons all amount to her boredom. She's tired of living with a good, hard working, dependable, but boring, father for her children. So she comes up with a lie, often files false “DV” or other “abuse” accusations on the advice of a lieyer, kicks him and takes him to the cleaners.
The other half of “families” in the US are the new feminist “family” which only has a mother and some bastard children by some random fuck she probably never got the name of. Having a long series of whoring affairs is not boring like a good marriage. Its the new feminist ideal.
Don't expect the truth about families and fathers to show up in the media on Father's Day. They all toe the feminist line and spend Father's Day week running a series of anti-men hate articles and cartoons. Count on it this year and every year. Kick her in the shin when you meet one of the medial bigots at the store.
Above I posted the hate cartoon because it had good graphics. Its supposedly a "joke." Hate is often disguised as a "joke." It doesn't change the hate in the cartoon, nor the reason that they publish it for Father's Day.
It is typical of all the major media who run hate for Father's Day. Here is another example of the typical daily Father's Day hate series from a print newspaper:
Time to disarm violent domestic abusers
Federal and state laws prohibit convicted domestic-violence offenders from possessing firearms, but enforcement of those laws has been lax, write guest columnists Merril Cousin and Nan Stoops. They urge all law-enforcement agencies to follow proven strategies for getting guns out of the home.
By Merril Cousin and Nan Stoops
Special to The (Seattle) Times
Most print, Internet, and TV media are running their annual week long anti-men hate specials for Father's Day this week. Call your local media and give them your manly opinion of their hate propaganda.
Labels: Amber Hate, family, Fatherhood, fathers, Feminism, Misandry, Racism
Friday, April 17, 2009
Freedom?
We have become the land of the enslaved and the home of the sheeple.
Bob is beginning a series of articles on freedom, what it actually means, and how to reclaim it. Bob is looking for anecdotes and stories about how the people are enslaved. Do you resent having to get a license and allow the state to control your every move and action? Is there any particular license that you find particularly offensive? Would you like to run a business without the state controlling you through their license requirements? Would you enjoy being able to run your own life and that of your family without constant coercion and control by the "Big Brother" state?
Bob is looking for stories and anecdotes to include in upcoming articles. Thank you all in advance.
Labels: Constitution, CPS, Criminal Gangs, Education, fathers, FBI, Feminism, First Amendment, government tyranny, Kids Rights, Lawyers, liberals, Misandry
Wednesday, November 26, 2008
Amber Hate Attacks Another Family
This past week Jose Olguin, of Saginaw, Michigan was traveling with his daughters, Victoria, 3; Lilliana, 5; and Elena, 9. Blue gun thugs and femiNazi hate fathers and families with a burning evil passion that comes straight from hell. When they learned that Jose was caring for his children it violates their matriarchal wet dreams of female rule and domination. They turned on the Amber Hate System to find and destroy Mr. Olguin.
Read story here.
Evil Saginaw blue gun thug femiNazi Lt. Tammy Luty paraded for femiNazi propaganda outlets bragging that they have successfully destroyed the father and stolen his children. Tim Martin, evil femiNazi propaganda writer for Associated Hate reports, "I'm just so thankful to God the children are safe. The prayers were answered," said Woodrow Wilson II, a longtime friend of Erica Olguin's. The evil hate propagandist knew all along that the children were “safe” with their father, but they push a theory that children being cared for they fathers are at risk. According to femiNazi hate and Amber Hate dogma, children can not be allowed to be with their fathers. The whole system is evil anti-family, anti-men, anti-children hate with no iota of justification.
Last week Ms. Erica Olguin, the feminist mother of the children learned that dead cunts don’t get custody of a man’s children when they attempt to destroy his family according to the femiNazi hate agenda. A father who defends his family against their evil triggers the most violent aggressive assault by the forces of femiNazi evil. Every one of the evil violent anti-family, anti-father scum should be shot on sight in order to protect and defend good families and restore the safety of our children. Luty, Wilson, Izzy, Martin, Cliff, Michigan State Gun Thugs, Saginaw Gun Thugs, and all those who work the Amber Hate program, are agents of evil who needs to be eradicated before families can live in peace in our land. All that it takes for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.
[See Legal Notice on the left column of The World According to Bob.]
Labels: Agents of Satan, AIS, Amber Hate, American Injustice System, Blue gun thugs, Crime, dead pigs, family, Fatherhood, fathers, police state
Monday, December 31, 2007
Political solicitations
Dear GOP USA Reader,
The election of 2008 could raise taxes, limit freedom and inaugurate the beginning of "big-brother" government, including socialized healthcare. We do not have the luxury to simply wait and discover what will happen. That is why it is important to continue fighting for conservative principles and policies and telling Americans the truth about the liberal policies Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi want to place on me and you.
We at the American Conservative Union fight daily for the core conservative principles that made our nation great. We mobilize hundreds of thousands of our grassroots activists to influence politics and change the course of legislation on Capital Hill. We also unite and train thousands of activists and current and future leaders at our annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Washington , D.C.
I want to thank you for all you do to help promote and strengthen conservatism. Your active involvement is critical as we face the challenges ahead.
Their message went on to list some of the usual irrelevant political crap that fails to address real men, and real families.
After carefully considering their request for about 3 seconds, Bob replied with the following notice:
Dear GOP USA
You have nothing in your message about restoring the rights of fathers and ending the feminist war on boys and men. Pound sand!
Bob
If you ever see a major political candidate of either party who's web site has a section on "Men's Issues" pleas let us know. Until then, Bob won’t vote for any of the feminazi scum and won‘t send their lying men-hating action groups a dime.
Labels: Campaign donations., Candidates, DNC, fathers, GOP, Men men's rights, Politics
Thursday, December 20, 2007
Florida's Ongoing War on Fathers
According to documents received under freedom of information statutes, Florida spend over $250,000 in legal fees and accepted many hours of donated time fighting a father who wanted the return of his daughter. Florida Department of Children and Families (DCF) had confiscated his daughter in 2005 after their mother became suicidal. Instead of returning the children to their father as is their responsibility to protect families, the misandrist hate mongering bigots at DCF tried to give the girl to another couple. Anti-men DCF warrior Bob Butterworth led a massively expensive fight to stop a father. This is the same Florida men-hating bigots who were responsible for the Elian Gonzales case a few years ago. Florida Governors Jeb Bush, and his Successor Charlie Crist were both involved in the anti-father hate campaign intended to destroy families by keeping children away from their fathers. Instead of returning the child to her own father the DCF tried to place her for adoption with another family. It's the horror show of the Elian Gonzales case all over again. These misandrist turds should have been shot the first time, before they could work their evil on more and more children, before they could destroy more and more families.
The girl's father, Mr. Rafael Izquierdo, a hard working Cuban farmer, wanted his daughter returned. A father has a basic human right to his daughter, and a child has a fundamental human right to her father. The State of Florida set out to trample the basic human rights of both the father and the girl. Florida has become the primer anti-men, anti-father hate state. Both Jeb Bush and Charlie Crist are men-hating scum who will stop at nothing to destroy a father's family, as their actions have so clearly demonstrated.
In the end, after intervention by federal courts, they only allowed the girl to go home to her father if he promised to return her to the would-be adoptive couple for visits every year. It was a rotten settlement forced by the feminazi war on fathers and families. May the DCF, Bush, Crist, Butterworth, and the rest of the Florida DCF lieyers and other scum all be sent to hell expeditiously.
Read news story
Labels: Charlie Crist, Cuba, Department of Children and Families, fathers, Florida, Jeb Bush
Tuesday, August 07, 2007
Toward a Men’s Nation
As I look back on history I recall that in this land in 1776 a group of courageous men formed a new nation and national government even while the land was owned and controlled by another nation. Wresting the land from the other government required several years, took 100,000 men willing to go to war, and cost the lives of 25,000 good men out of a total population of 4 million. A similar proportion today would require close to 10 million men willing to leave their families and go to war for the Men’s Nation, and cost close to a quarter of a million deaths. The opposition would be just as fierce, with the current government looting and burning, killing men, women, children, and even shooting our dogs to demoralize and terrorize the new nation of MEN. Certainly Bob does not advocate the violent overthrow of any government despite clearly illegal ongoing violations of its constitution.
What is needed is a new kind of nation, a nation within other nations, a nation dedicated to love and families and a future for men and our children. We need a nation where our daughters can grow up, get married, raise our grandchildren, and live full, rich, wonderful lives. We need a nation where our sons can grow up into valuable men, find decent wives, raise good families, and have full, rich, satisfying lives. We need a nation where real MEN come together to protect and support each other and each other’s families. We need a nation where feminist political crap and lies are ignored or persecuted, where courageous men make war on the feminazi death camps, their SS troops, and their propaganda ministers.
We need a Men’s Nation where men pledge their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor to the nation of men. We need a Men’s Nation where courageous men can form action groups that protect the honor and families of men. We need a men’s nation that can explain the facts of life and death to evil cunt licking politicians and their cadres of hired gun thugs.
We need a men’s nation where the rightful place of the husband and father is at the head of the household, where the husband and father has the responsibility and authority to decide what is best for his family. We need a nation where neither the evil lesbitches from CPS nor the lieyers and agents of Satan in black robes of hell can come to take our children without fearing that their wasted lives will soon be over. We need a nation where a man supports his family by providing food at dinnertime and a place for them to sleep, not by paying some evil bitch for destroying his family and taking his children.
Forming new Men’s Nation is not an impossible dream. All it would take is 50 or 100 real MEN of courage and substance who are willing to pledge their lives, their honor, and 10% of their fortune to its creation and continuation. To begin, the Men’s Nation would form a secret meeting, a secret recognition, a secret handshake, a secret initiation, and a public political arm.
The Nation of Men would have to be a new kind of international or transnational political organization, different from current land nations, different from historic secret men’s fraternal groups, different from historic religious organizations and denominations, a new kind of thing. We can model much of our political organization on manly nations of the past, taking good aspects of Romans, Greeks, Vikings, Franks, Celts, and Britons. Men are warriors and poets, lovers and leaders, fathers and sons.
Is it time to begin forming a new Nation of Men and to begin overturning the feminazi domination of the 20th century?
Update
Bob has been informed that this article has been being translated into Hebrew and posted in a web site in Israel. Here is the URL for the Hebrew translation.
Many of Bob's articles are available for MEN to repost. Please request permission and provide URL information when it is reposted. All of Bob's articles are copyright according to US and International law.
[See legal notice at left column.]
Labels: fathers, Men men's rights, men's activism, men's nation, patriarch